Apple tries to get Justice Department antitrust lawsuit dismissed

see now ReutersApple will happen today Ask U.S. District Judge Julien Neals in Newark, New Jersey, to dismiss the case. At the heart of Apple’s argument is that being forced to share its technology with rivals will end innovation.

At the same time, Justice Department lawyers will present their arguments as to why the case should proceed. There are many parts to the DOJ case, but as an example it accuses Apple of forcing people to buy iPhones to participate in Messages conversations.

This accusation is illustrative of the entire Justice Department case because it is nonsense. No doubt Apple knew this would be an indictment, but RCS support was announced on the iPhone before the Department of Justice reported it.

So whatever the actual impetus, Apple is not doing exactly and unequivocally what it is accused of. Similarly, the Justice Department says Apple denied competitors access to NFC technology in the iPhone and failed to do so.

This isn’t a matter of favoring Apple or giving it the benefit of the doubt. straight real. There is nothing in the Justice Department lawsuit that accurately accuses Apple of anything it is currently doing.

As a result, if the lawsuit was intended to prevent Apple from taking various antitrust actions, it worked before the lawsuit was even filed.

This should, in theory, mean that Apple’s motion to dismiss should be granted. But this is not Apple’s case against its rival, but Apple’s case against a bipartisan lawsuit filed by a federal agency and multiple states.

It is very unlikely that the case will be dismissed. Equally extremely unlikely The Ministry of Justice may win, but the case will not end today, it will last for years.