Diddy Jane Doe’s Accuser Cannot Remain Anonymous, Judge Rules

A woman suing Sean “Diddy” Combs For sexual assault, she must reveal her identity or face the possibility of her case being dismissed.

The Tennessee resident filed a lawsuit against Diddy, claiming he assaulted her at a party two decades ago when she was a 19-year-old college student. He filed his claim under a pseudonym, but a federal judge ruled that the case could not proceed anonymously. ABC News.

“Simply put, allegations of sexual assault alone are not sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to sue under a pseudonym,” Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil said in her decision.

The judge disagreed with the accuser’s argument that he could be harmed if his identity was known.

“Combs has had no contact with the Plaintiff in the nearly 20 years since the alleged rape, and Combs is currently remanded in custody pending trial,” Judge Vyskocil said. “Therefore, counsel did not identify any present threat of physical harm to Plaintiff.”

While the judge acknowledged that Jane Doe may be subject to public scrutiny, he said that this “does not outweigh the interests of both Combs and the public in the traditional and constitutionally established presumption of openness in judicial proceedings.”

A woman with a “public identity” earlier this year he asked A judge who will remain anonymous in his lawsuit against Diddy and Harve Pierre, the former head of Bad Boy Records.

“Due to the power and influence of my former employer, I fear that I will be harassed and ridiculed if my identity is disclosed in connection with these allegations,” he explained. “I am concerned for my physical safety and the safety of my family.”

Diddy denies the allegations. He is behind bars at MDC, awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy and transportation to engage in prostitution.