Jojo Yok and Dode Cruz camp react to Justice Department rape accusations

Trigger Warning: This article contains graphic details about sexual acts and acts of lust

GORGY RULE

An official statement was made by Puno Law and its legal counsel Sandro MuhlachWorking with GMA-7 to find the best solution for advertising and advertising, and Sandro working with independent contractors on Richard “Dode” Cruz with No Jojo.

Bahaiging on Puno Law: “At this point, we call on GMA Network, Inc. to release its decision regarding Sandro’s complaint against Mr. Cruz and Mr. Yok, which is still pending to this day. We trust that GMA Network, Inc. will honor its commitment that the investigation against Mr. Nones and Mr. Cruz was conducted ‘with the highest standards of fairness and impartiality.’

“If the Department of Justice finds that Mr. Nones and Mr. Cruz committed the crimes of sexual assault and rape through acts of lust against Sandro, GMA will have more reason to remove Mr. Nones and Mr. Cruz from the GMA workplace. to provide a safe and respectful environment for its artists.”

To read: Sandro Muhlach’s statement from legal counsel regarding Justice Department rape charges against Jojo Nones and Dode Cruz

GMA-7 IN THE SANDRO MUHLACH CASE

Kaugnay Rito started a reaction in PEP Troika, Atty. Annette Gozon-Valdes, p.Senior vice president of Programming, Talent Management, Worldwide and Support Group under GMA Films.

Ang sabi ni Av. Annette, a very tall body and kanilang imbestigation draft findings.

At Sparkle GMA Artist Center, the talent management arm at GMA-7, Sandro has no plans for his career in showbiz by working with independent contractors.

Ganoon was at a time when he had no plans with an actor.

“For Sandro, Sparkle will continue to provide the same level of support and assistance as his manager, just as we have done the same all along,” said Ms. Joy Marcelo, First Vice President of Sparkle GMA Artist Center. he said.

To read: Sandro Muhlach: “The justice system accepted the truth.”

JERRY OLEA

Richard Cruz and the Justice Department’s decision are in Jojo Yok’s camp.

A statement from the PEP Troika refused to give up on brief encroachments on lascivious acts by independent contractors.

The statement in the ipinadala of Atty. Maggie Abraham-Garduque, in the PEP Troika, did not react to the decision of the Department of Justice.

STATEMENT OF JOJO NONES AND DODE CRUZ LEGAL COUNSELOR

Narito and Kanyang Kabuuang statement of the lawyer. Maggie has a very sensitive nature:

“The DOJ’s decision does not justify indictment. This is my reaction when I read the Department of Justice decision.

“Based on the DOJ’s decision, there is a reasonable certainty of conviction for Cruz and Nones to be charged with 1 count of sexual assault and 2 counts of sexual abuse.

“The basis for the decision to charge our clients for sexual assault was that Sandro was allegedly able to prove that Richard, with the help of Jojo, was able to insert his tongue into Sandro’s anal hole.

“However, the decision states and I quote: ‘It is worth emphasizing that in this case, the complainant Sandro clearly stated in his statement of complaint that the defendant Richard spread her butt cheeks and ‘licked’ her asshole. The relevant provision of complainant Sandro’s affidavit reads as follows: ‘naramdaman ko na lang na ni-stretch nya po yung butt cheek ko at naramdaman ko po ang dila nya sa butthole ko xxx’.

“Unlike ‘sucking’, insertion can occur in ‘licking’ as it requires the tongue to stick out.

“Therefore, according to the decision, Sandro said that Richard only licked his asshole.

“If what is licked is only the asshole, then there is no such thing as insertion. If the tongue enters the asshole, insertion occurs.

The decision further states: Additionally, during the declaratory hearing, the complaint Sandro confirmed that he felt defendant Richard insert his tongue into his anal hole.

“This is not true; During the disclosure hearing, Sandro continued to say that he licked Richard’s asshole.

“Equally, it is our contention that it is physically impossible to insert the tongue into the anal hole without causing any damage. You would have to overextend it to create an opening that would naturally result in tearing or injury.

“However, the decision states that if there is injury, daw puwedeng nag-heal na: “Ricalde vs. Ricalde by the Supreme Court. As decided in the People case, ‘The court had declared only the corroborative nature of the expert testimony and the possibility of a conviction for rape. based on the victim’s sole credible testimony. In any event, the coroner explained that the negative finding of trauma to the anal orifice did not rule out the possibility of insertion, given the flexibility of the sphincter. xxx xxx xxx

“It should be known that the sphincter, which is the part of the anus that controls bowel movement, has a certain flexibility to resist any inserted object and that this area is multi-vascular, that is, rich in blood. Supply to ensure that any injury heals within 24 hours or less.

“But the panel may have forgotten that the same evidence from Sandro’s medical examiner clearly stated that there was no injury or laceration to Sandro’s anal area, whether new or healed.

“So there is absolutely no basis for accusing Jojo and Richard of sexual assault.”

To read: Sandro Muhlach, a naranasan and a pang-aabuso idinetalye

NOEL FERRER

Pagpapatuloy and Atty. “Even the DOJ panel’s findings that there were 2 acts of lasciviousness are of no value,” Maggie said.

“According to the decision and as far as I quote, ‘In this case, while the defendants were sucking and licking the balls, penis and nipples of the complainant Sandro in their hotel room, the complainant Sandro was helpless under the influence of drugs and alcohol.’

“However, Sandro’s drug test result states that he is negative for any illicit substances.

“There is therefore no basis to say that the alleged lascivious acts were committed because Sandro was very weak and dizzy due to his use of drugs and alcohol. There was no evidence he presented that Sandro had actually been drugged.

“Even the DOJ acknowledges that the burden is on Sandro to prove his allegations, but the decision did not specify what evidence there was to prove Sandro’s allegations. On the contrary, his evidence is inconsistent with his claims.

“Therefore, for us, the amount of evidence presented by the Department of Justice that was a reasonable certainty of conviction was not met by Sandro.”

Does Jojo have a reaction to Richard?

Sagot and Av. Maggie: “Jojo and Richard are disappointed with the decision. According to them, the reasons put forward do not support the findings.

“Therefore, we will object to this decision. We may also file a lawsuit to cancel the information submitted to the court.”