Cornish jury asked who they believe

North Abaco Congressman Kirk Cornish in court yesterday. Photo: “Pavel Bailey”

By PAVEL BAILEY

Tribune Staff Reporter

[email protected]

North Abaco Rep. Kirk Cornish’s attorney called the complainant in his client’s rape case a “liar” and a “scorned woman” during closing arguments last week, while the prosecution countered that she was “bullied and beaten” by Cornish.

The conflicting allegations emerged as attorney Tai Pinder-Mackey and prosecutor Timothy Bailey addressed the nine-member jury with their final words.

Ms Pinder-Mackey, Cornish’s defense lawyer, argued that Cornish was the real victim and advised the jury to make an objective decision.

He highlighted what he saw as inconsistencies in the complainant’s account and noted that the complainant’s mother allegedly corroborated his claim that any contact with Cornish’s eye was accidental.

Pinder-Mackey accused the complainant of using this “fake accident” to fabricate new allegations against his client. He criticized the police investigation as “shoddy” and a lack of proper examination, particularly the lack of physical evidence such as a rape kit, blood samples or forensic documents.

Noting other alleged inconsistencies, Ms Pinder-Mackey argued the case was based solely on “he said, she said” evidence.

He also questioned the complainant’s credibility, noting inconsistencies regarding a second phone call, timeline inconsistencies and her description of when she and Cornish began their relationship.

He questioned why the complainant allowed Cornish into his home after she was allegedly assaulted, and argued that Cornish’s status as an MP in Abaco did not justify his reluctance to report the alleged assault locally.

Meanwhile, prosecutor Timothy Bailey stood by the complainant’s testimony, arguing that she testified honestly and consistently under intense questioning.

Prosecutor Bailey described Cornish as controlling and manipulative in their relationships, highlighting incidents where Cornish allegedly took the complainant’s phone or used threats and physical aggression to control her.

Bailey described her as a victim of abuse who eventually found the courage to confront the “monster.” He asked the jury to find Cornish guilty based on his testimony and the control he exerted over her life.

He drew attention to many examples described by the complainant in his statement; She detailed how Cornish pinned her down, spat on her, threatened her with violence and physically harmed her during clashes in Abaco and New Providence.

He argued that the defendant’s alleged behavior reflected a pattern of intimidation and control, saying: “It’s up to you to decide who to believe.”

Judge Renae McKay is presiding over the hearing. The decision was expected to be announced that day.