Dr Femi Olaleye released and acquitted: Court of Appeal sentences Lagos doctor Wey Bin Chop to life imprisonment for alleged rape of minor

The Court of Appeal’s decision was based on the fact that six of the prosecution witnesses appeared twice in the trial court. Dr. No evidence is shown that Olaleye committed rape, and there is no tally of the evidence.

The top court also said the trial judge went down to the arena, which accused the judge of interfering and interfering in the case.

“My conclusion is that the court’s decision is perverse. Dr. “On this occasion, Olufemi Olaleye was released and acquitted,” he said.

The court, Dr. Olaleye’s wife confirmed that Bin confiscated my phone and emailed me evidence that the prosecution used as evidence against the man in court.

According to the court, the doctor and his wife also approached the court on the separation case and said that it was okay to bring him as a witness and rely on his testimony as evidence because he took special care of di mata.

“She changed the ownership of her car without my consent, tried to sell my house and tried to remove the man who was the signatory of the joint account, and also tried to move her dia children abroad without the man’s consent,” the court heard.

All this happened while the man remained under the surveillance of the security guard and this situation continues.

The court says that it is possible to say that the wife acted out of greed and planned to gain wealth and seize her man’s property, money and children.

The court said, “Since he is a flawed witness, he needs to be careful with his evidence.”

According to the court, evidence shows that the doctor’s wife beat the little girl for two days, so we forced her to come forward to confess to the abuse.

“In my opinion, an application should be made to the lower court to not take the statement of the girl in question, so her statements do not count.”

The Supreme Court, Dr. He said the court made a mistake in sentencing based on the fact that Olaleye’s wife’s and daughter’s information were not tallied.

According to the Religious Law, the evidence presented by a child to the court is valid for the court.

The court also stated that there were inconsistencies between the evidence they presented to the court and the evidence in the medical report.

The court said, “There is no evidence of forced sexual intercourse between the two parties.”

According to the court, video evidence shows that the girl had sexual intercourse with the doorman of the house, so “how come the man is being prosecuted for di mata?”

Justice Bada said the members of the appeal panel were satisfied with the decision.

Mr. Babajide Martin of the State Prosecution Department represents the state on behalf of the court, while Barister Chukwudi Enebeli leads the appeals team