Starmer’s ‘gentle parenting’ on benefits isn’t working

Opening flagship back-to-work plan to tackle unemployment Today, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s government ruled out a crackdown on sickness benefits, pledging only to launch a lengthy consultation on cutting benefits next year.

With no defined sanctions for refusing to take a job and no mention of a time limit on unconditional benefits, Starmer uses his gentle parenting technique on those seeking benefits. This not only fails them, but also frustrates the rest of society.

The problem is, as anyone who’s ever encountered a restaurant meal ruined by a child whose parents rewarded bad behavior with a noisy iPad knows, this technique doesn’t help either the person or anyone around them.

Gentle parenting without boundaries; It means that skills such as flexibility, patience and handling disappointment are not developed. The same goes for unemployment.

Starmer appears to be playing Good Cop, using the Budget to make a huge payout to the NHS last month before demanding efficiency improvements and paying train drivers without asking for changes to outdated working practices. But for the Good Cop concept to work, you also need Bad Cop. Otherwise, you’re just a cop.

The proposals announced today are a modest affair, unlike the efforts of former chancellor Gordon Brown at the turn of the century, who put sustained pressure on young people to get jobs or training and invested billions of pounds in work benefits.

Vague “partnerships” with organizations such as the Premier League are being discussed. It promises independent reviews into the employment of disabled people and promoting a healthy workplace. The Job Center system will be “transformed” into a new job and career service. Meanwhile, “pioneering” programs in eight regions of England will mobilize “everyone who wants to work” so they can get “united support” and mayors and councils will help “power” change.

Starmer undeniably understands the problem when he says, “Britain isn’t working.” However, he cannot fight with the speed and power he needs.

Economic inactivity has been getting worse since the pandemic began. Between July and September this year, 9.2 million adults of working age were neither working nor looking for work; This figure is 878,000 more than before the pandemic. Statistics show that older people are more likely to cite physical ailments as a reason for leaving work, while younger people are more likely to seek help for mental illnesses.

There is also a generational divide in attitudes. Older voters are simultaneously puzzled, irritated, and impatient by the earnestness and concern of young people who expect to be given a good, interesting job before taking on hard work.

According to the survey conducted by JL Partners, 30 percent of seniors over the age of 65 think that mental health problems are discussed too much, while this rate is 7 percent for young people under the age of 25. Only 37 percent of the elderly think that this issue is also discussed. A little.

However, it is clear that this is an unsolvable problem for young people. One in five 16 to 24-year-olds who were not in education, employment or training had a mental health problem last year, according to official research.

This increase in inactivity has coincided with an increase in the number of young adults receiving health-related disability benefits. The number of new applicants aged 16 to 24 increased by 24 per cent in the year to July, largely driven by claims of anxiety, depression and autism.

The post-pandemic mental health crisis has affected young people in the UK at much higher rates than their peers in other developed economies. Experts can’t decide whether this mental health epidemic is caused by or caused by unemployment. The answer probably lies somewhere in between.

There are some signs that the government is doing more to encourage young people to work. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has announced that the Apprenticeship Levy, which has hitherto been an extra payroll tax, will be transformed into a more flexible “growth and skills” provision, allowing more businesses to claim the funding back.

While Starmer and Kendall are almost neurotically careful not to use Tory language for “tramps” or “slackers”, some left-wing Labor MPs You look determined to smell it.. Diane Abbott accused the Government of “selling the mythology of self-serving thugs”.

Read Next

But Abbott is not where the people are. Bringing people back to work is both a priority for the public and an opportunity for the economy. And unfortunately for one in five anxious young people, the public is not on their side.

According to pollster YouGov, 27 per cent of Brits have a negative view of welfare recipients; Only 12 percent say they have an overall positive view of welfare recipients. Among Labor voters who have the least negative view of benefits, the 16 per cent with a positive view outweighs the 18 per cent with a negative view.

Surveys show that while people with physical disabilities are generally positive about getting help, attitudes towards mental health issues are less liberal. Even young people think the welfare system is too generous for their generation.

Scarlett Maguire, director at JL Partners, said: “While young people may not feel as strongly about benefits compared to the general population, they are actually less likely to feel that the benefits system overall is not generous enough.” I.

Of course, reducing disease rates alone will not get young people back to work; The data also shows a skills shortage and a tight job market. A constrained Starmer is trying to deliver welfare changes against a backlash from businesses about how his budget will hinder job creation.

CBI chief Rain Newton-Smith said firms were in “damage control” after the tax hike budget and almost half were planning to cut their workforce.

Meanwhile, Deputy Chancellor Angela Rayner’s new employment rights from her first day in office mean employers now face greater risk in hiring new staff, according to the Regulatory Policy Committee.

Against this backdrop, Starmer has the political space to toughen up when the government consults on aid sanctions next year. It may be time for both the party and the country to address the uncomfortable truth about the size of unemployed households. More importantly, it may be exacerbated by the lack of incentives for people to take benefits and move into employment.

It’s time to put gentle parenting aside and tell our own MPs and the country where the borders are. According to the poll, he will find the majority on his side.