New York Times Attacks Tulsi Gabbard for the Wrong Reasons

In an attack article worthy of a sensational tabloid newspaper, New York Times He opens fire on Trump’s new presidential candidate, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. Especially, Times She doesn’t mention Gabbard’s Support for Israeli genocide Describing himself as an “anti-terrorism hawk” and anti-Islamism in Gaza. Rather, Times Gabbard is paralyzed by her opposition to the US proxy war in Ukraine and her desire for better relations with Russia. Times He dismisses Hillary Clinton’s slander against Gabbard as a “Russian asset.”

As evidence, Times Excerpts from Gabbard’s tweet in February 2022, as the war began in Ukraine:

“This war and suffering could have easily been avoided if Biden Admin/NATO had simply acknowledged Russia’s legitimate security concerns regarding Ukraine’s membership in NATO; This would mean US/NATO forces coming to the Russian border.”

Well, NYT Editors, isn’t that the case? It’s time to catch up with the rest of the world and your fellow Americans. According to a latest Harris poll70 percent of the public in the United States wants negotiations to end the war in Ukraine.

New York Times But neither the Biden administration is listening. President Biden’s unilateral decision this week to green light Russia to attack with US long-range missiles condemned by US peace groups.

“By approving these attacks, the Biden White House chose to make the United States a direct party to the Ukraine-Russia war; crossed the previous red line and caused Russia to lower the threshold for using nuclear weapons…. Biden, a lame duck president, is choosing to escalate tensions at the last minute to make it even more difficult for the incoming administration to broker a peaceful solution.” wrote Code Pink, World Beyond War, Veterans for Peace, Peace in the Ukrainian Coalition And End of Wars Working Group of America’s Progressive Democrats.”

The Biden Administration later announced it would send it. internationally banned mines will further pollute Ukrainian lands over the coming decades.

The one thing the U.S. peace movement might welcome from the incoming Trump administration—negotiations to end the war in Ukraine—is under fierce attack. New York Times but by most of the political establishment. Does this mean that the peace movement, along with the majority of the American people, is now a “Russian entity”?

Those who call for peace may face more slander and pressure. Even nowCongress passed a bill, HR 9495, This could allow the Treasury to strip nonprofit status of organizations that criticize Israel or U.S. foreign policy (“supporting terrorists”). Peace activists, human rights defenders, and defenders of the U.S. Constitution: be alert and ready, but do not be discouraged. You are a bright light in these gloomy and dreary times.